-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New package: opensnitch-1.3.6 #29849
Conversation
Should closes #28819 |
Should be one |
Is there a reason to split this into a meta package and a |
It was easier since |
Can subpackages have a different build-style from the source package? |
No subpackages just move files from the main package, you would have to build it in the main package so you would have to do your own do_configure/do_build/do_install to build both and then move files into sub packages. |
Alright, I'll try that. |
@Duncaen maybe make one package for daemon and one for UI, to avoid having to duplicate most of the build logic? And make the daemon depend on the UI, if that makes sense. I agree on the meta not being necessary. It's unfortunate that they use the same distfiles for both... If we go the route of separate packages, I'd add a comment to each template about keeping in sync with the other. |
The separation between ui and daemon doesn't make a lot of sense and becomes cyclic if we add the dependencies on each other, which would be the only correct way to ensure that both are installed and at the same version. |
Finally got it to work |
@ericonr does this look okay? |
Sorry, I won't be able to review this soon. |
General
Have the results of the proposed changes been tested?
closes #28819