New package: rockpro64-base and rockpro64-uboot

[tiemenwerkman]

General

• This is a new package and it conforms to the quality requirements

Have the results of the proposed changes been tested?

• I use the packages affected by the proposed changes on a regular basis and confirm this PR works for me
• I generally don't use the affected packages but briefly tested this PR

Does it build and run successfully?

(Please choose at least one native build and, if supported, at least one cross build. More are better.)

• I built this PR locally for my native architecture, (ARCH-LIBC)
• I built this PR locally for these architectures (if supported. mark crossbuilds):
  • aarch64-musl
  • armv7l
  • armv6l-musl

I'm not clear on what the build section above means. Here's what I did: I have built these packages on my desktop pc which is x86_64. When building the packages I specified "-a aarch64" to "./xbps-src" to build the packages for arm64. I believe that makes it a crossbuild as it was not built on a native arm64 platform.

[CameronNemo]

When building the packages I specified "-a aarch64" to "./xbps-src" to build the packages for arm64. I believe that makes it a crossbuild as it was not built on a native arm64 platform.

Yeah that was a cross build on glibc.

We like to have the commit messages have a specific format. Right now this branch has 8 commits with a lot of merge commits. You should only have two commits (in the same branch/PR), as I mentioned before. Always rebase commits on master, do not merge master into your branch. You should probably review the CONTRIBUTING.md document in this repo.

[CameronNemo]

@tiemenwerkman

Please abstain from temporarily closing a pull request while revising the templates. Instead, leave a comment on the PR describing what still needs work, or add "[WIP]" to the PR title. Only close your pull request if you're sure you don't want your changes to be included.

It is suggested that you keep the same branch name and PR, and just force push to the branch if you are making changes. When you keep closing PRs, it makes the review process more difficult.