Bump cross-arm-none-eabi gcc and binutils to match non-cross packages #37580
Conversation
|
Pull Requests become stale 90 days after last activity and are closed 14 days after that. If this pull request is still relevant bump it or assign it. |
|
Hm this is not being updated in #34902 unlike |
|
Copying @oreo639's response from
|
|
Hi, I definitely still have interest in this, and use this set of packages for embedded use, I just haven't had time to fix the issues that cropped up. Additionally I think I'd need to bump libstdc++ too, and at this point I might as well match the versions that gcc/binutils uses now. I'll take another stab at this soon. |
|
We are actively working on updating gcc here: #34902 |
| @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ maintainer="Ivan Sokolov <ivan-p-sokolov@ya.ru>" | |||
| license="GPL-3.0-or-later" | |||
| homepage="https://www.gnu.org/software/${_pkgname}/" | |||
| distfiles="${GNU_SITE}/${_pkgname}/${_pkgname}-${version}.tar.xz" | |||
| checksum=0ab6c55dd86a92ed561972ba15b9b70a8b9f75557f896446c82e8b36e473ee04 | |||
| checksum=1b11659fb49e20e18db460d44485f09442c8c56d5df165de9461eb09c8302f85 | |||
| nocross=yes | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Random drive-by query - why is this nocross=yes (cross-arm-none-eabi-gdb/newlib don't have this)?
|
Pull Requests become stale 90 days after last activity and are closed 14 days after that. If this pull request is still relevant bump it or assign it. |
bump! 😋 |
Testing the changes
I tested this with my own personal armv7 projects. Notably, the version currently in packages has a bug with LTO that makes it discard ISR functions/symbols inappropriately, making LTO useless for some embedded use cases. This appears fixed in gcc 10.
Local build testing