New package: tinyramfs-0.1.0

[apprehensions]

Testing the changes

• I tested the changes in this PR: YES

New package

• This new package conforms to the quality requirements: YES

Local build testing

• I built this PR locally for my native architecture, (x86_64)

[apprehensions]

as this is an alternative to dracut, is there anything more i have to do to this package?

dracut is a dependency of linux-base. it'd have to be set to be an ignored package inorder to use tinyramfs and not have conflicting initramfs'

[dkwo]

Perhaps edit srcpkgs/xbps-triggers/files/initramfs-regenerate as done for #29434 ?

[apprehensions]

wouldn't it have merge conflicts? It should be merged first before I add the entry.

[dkwo]

I don't know, it's been there forever. Perhaps a new PR just for the initram choice?

[ahesford]

Handling of alternative initramfs generators has changed. Please adapt changes from #39284 to make this package use the initramfs XBPS alternative group.

[dkwo]

@apprehensions are you still interested in this? do you need help adapting it to the alternative mechanism?

[apprehensions]

I no longer use void