Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New package: gitoxide-0.20.0 #40201

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 22, 2023
Merged

Conversation

jcgruenhage
Copy link
Contributor

Testing the changes

  • I tested the changes in this PR: YES

New package

@classabbyamp classabbyamp added the new-package This PR adds a new package label Oct 28, 2022
@jcgruenhage jcgruenhage changed the title New package: gitoxide-0.16.0 New package: gitoxide-0.19.0 Nov 22, 2022
@JamiKettunen
Copy link
Contributor

JamiKettunen commented Dec 20, 2022

$ ./xbps-src update-check gitoxide
NO VERSION found for gitoxide

Seems upstream has some monorepo on GitHub so getting the latest version from there could end up being impossible specifically after some components other than gitoxide itself have enough new releases/tags, perhaps parsing from site='https://crates.io/crates/gitoxide/versions' would be better?

@jcgruenhage
Copy link
Contributor Author

That crates.io page doesn't work the way we want either, the list loads via js...

@jcgruenhage
Copy link
Contributor Author

site='https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index/master/gi/to/gitoxide'
pattern='"vers":"\K[\d.]+(?=",)'

That works as intended though, and it's using the same data source that the crates.io link would have been using.

@jcgruenhage jcgruenhage changed the title New package: gitoxide-0.19.0 New package: gitoxide-0.20.0 Jan 22, 2023
@Piraty Piraty merged commit 93b253f into void-linux:master Jan 22, 2023
@jcgruenhage jcgruenhage deleted the gitoxide-0.16.0_1 branch January 23, 2023 09:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
new-package This PR adds a new package
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants