New package: flavours-0.6.1

[Newchair2644]

Testing the changes

• I tested the changes in this PR: YES

New package

• This new package conforms to the package requirements: YES

Local build testing

• I built this PR locally for my native architecture, (x86_64, glibc)

[Newchair2644]

On my machine, I did run xlint on the first commit that used $wrksrc, but it didn't catch any errors. I ran xlint srcpkgs/flavours/template and common/travis/xlint.sh srcpkgs/flavours/template, but neither caught the mistake. My master branch was up to date with upstream. Please let me know what I am doing wrong, would appreciate (this is my first package). Thank you!

[paper42]

CI uses the newest xlint, on your system you probably have the xlint from the last xtools release.

[paper42]

please squash the commits

[Newchair2644]

I made a mess! Sorry I know you have better things to do than teach me how to git but I'm not sure how to do this. I tried to run git rebase -i HEAD~2 but it gave me this output:

error: cannot 'squash' without a previous commit
You can fix this with 'git rebase --edit-todo' and then run 'git rebase --continue'.
Or you can abort the rebase with 'git rebase --abort'.

So for some reason I decided it was a good idea to merge master and this was the result. Sorry about this!

[Newchair2644]

Okay so I reverted the branch back to my last commit with git reset 1aaa6853bb8363cb5d7917ee86074683f8882c7b and git push --force but I am still getting the same error when I try to squash the commits.

[Newchair2644]

Nevermind I figured it out. I was using squash on both commits when I should have been using pick on the first commit and squash on the second. Such a simple thing I managed to almost mess up so badly lol. Good thing git revert exists!

[github-actions]

Pull Requests become stale 90 days after last activity and are closed 14 days after that. If this pull request is still relevant bump it or assign it.

[Newchair2644]

Is there anything preventing this PR from being merged? I noticed it has become stale.

[paper42]

from me, my lack of interest in this package, but I can't speak for other maintainers

[Anachron]

I am using this package for a week now without issues.
In fact, I believe the quality should suffice to be included.