New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New packages: ipsvd, socklog-ucspi #41321
Conversation
Packaging ipsvd is fine, I'd not change the depends for socklog as this is a mode that's rarely used. |
You could make a socklog-remote or so package that depends on socklog and ipsvd and provides a service. |
The problem is that the current installation of socklog is broken precisely because it assumes
|
I doubt this will be accepted here.
I believe you assume removal of the feature. See above.
It would be nice to inform a user of tcpsvd coming with a separate package, but Void Linux is not the open based operating system with documentation stored in manual pages, meaning that void-specific documentation is handled in a different way (see void-docs). Maybe it will be accepted at least there. |
Void depends are only for essential dependencies, if you configure socklog to use tcpsvd, it's your problem to have the appropriate tools installed. (My suggestion was to actually add a preconfigured setup to the socklog-ucspi package, however.) |
Interesting. I hadn't thought of it this way before. In this case perhaps it's better to not create a runfile that is broken by default? If the user has to go through the steps of installing tcpsvd, then s/he is probably adept enough to create an appropriate service. |
I had my doubts for this new metapackage, but it seems I completely misunderstood your suggestion. |
cc: @leahneukirchen (socklog's maintainer)
Closes #41300.
socklog-ucspi
Testing the changes
ipsvd
The build method is not much different from socklog (the same author).
Testing the changes
New package