New package: radio-sh-2.0

[Singustromo]

Testing the changes

• I tested the changes in this PR: YES

New package

• This new package conforms to the package requirements: YES

Local build testing

• I built this PR locally for my native architecture, (x86_64-LIBC)

[classabbyamp]

1. System: The software should be installed system-wide, not per-user.
2. Compiled: The software needs to be compiled before being used, even if it is software that is not needed by the whole system.
3. Required: Another package either within the repository or pending inclusion requires the package.

[...] Simple shell scripts are unlikely to be accepted unless they provide considerable value to a broad user base. [...]

from CONTRIBUTING.md

how does this meet those requirements?

[ahesford]

This belongs in ~/bin, not a distribution package.

[Singustromo]

1. System: The software should be installed system-wide, not per-user.
2. Compiled: The software needs to be compiled before being used, even if it is software that is not needed by the whole system.
3. Required: Another package either within the repository or pending inclusion requires the package.

[...] Simple shell scripts are unlikely to be accepted unless they provide considerable value to a broad user base. [...]

from CONTRIBUTING.md

how does this meet those requirements?

All right, I thought it might be something worth adding since there are also packages like #14199 with similar functionality but also with more dependencies. PyRadio - in the end of the day - is also a wrapper for mpv.

[ahesford]

It's not about the length of the shell script, but whether

curl -L -O ~/bin/output.sh https://some-url-for-download

is equivalent to

xbps-install some-package

and, for a single shell script that is intended for individual use on a personal computer, is generally true. It is certainly true here. The PyRadio package requires a proper installation and integration into the system's python ecosystem (or else venv management) and is therefore a candidate for packaging.

[Singustromo]

Thank you for the explanation. I did not think of it this way.

Is there another way - in general - to share such things in an unobtrusive manner?