Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

wander: update to 0.14.1 #48043

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

robinovitch61
Copy link
Contributor

@robinovitch61 robinovitch61 commented Jan 3, 2024

Testing the changes

  • I tested the changes in this PR: NO (see below)

@Clos3y
Copy link
Contributor

Clos3y commented Jan 3, 2024

Change the PR name to wander: update to 0.14.1 (see here).

  • I tested the changes in this PR: YES|briefly|NO

Did you test the changes?

@robinovitch61 robinovitch61 changed the title Update version to 0.14.1 wander: update to 0.14.1 Jan 3, 2024
@robinovitch61
Copy link
Contributor Author

Change the PR name to wander: update to 0.14.1 (see here).

  • I tested the changes in this PR: YES|briefly|NO

Did you test the changes?

Thanks. I see now that I'll have to update the checksum, but not sure how without being able to run xgensum (I maintain wander but don't run Void Linux). Also not sure I'll be able to test things without running Void Linux. I may not be the best person to make this version bump.

@Clos3y
Copy link
Contributor

Clos3y commented Jan 3, 2024

Thanks. I see now that I'll have to update the checksum, but not sure how without being able to run xgensum

No worries. It's just the hash of your distfile,

$ sha256sum v0.14.1.tar.gz

Also not sure I'll be able to test things without running Void Linux. I may not be the best person to make this version bump.

There are containers for docker/podman that you can use to test, but don't worry. @Vaelatern is the maintainer for this package on Void.

@robinovitch61
Copy link
Contributor Author

Great, thank you. I added the checksum (sha256sum ~/Downloads/wander-0.14.1.tar.gz) and have started the testing process in a container, but have to run. Will update this PR when testing is complete

@Vaelatern
Copy link
Member

Vaelatern commented Jan 3, 2024

why in a container? just xi the package. Use xbps-src in your workflow, it does all the work and cleanup for you!

Edit: I see, you author Wander and don't run Void. I'll merge this after I test it. Thank you!

@robinovitch61
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sounds good, thanks for testing and merging @Vaelatern

@Vaelatern Vaelatern closed this in 428bb70 Jan 4, 2024
zen0bit pushed a commit to oSoWoSo/VUR that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2024
Closes: void-linux#48043 [via git-merge-pr]
zen0bit pushed a commit to oSoWoSo/VUR that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2024
Closes: void-linux#48043 [via git-merge-pr]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants