common/shlibs: add missing shlibs

[chrysos349]

Testing the changes

• I tested the changes in this PR: YES

[Chocimier]

What package fails to build due to lack of these entries?

[chrysos349]

Those that depend on those shlibs. From my private repo. Why does it matter?

fwupd, gst-plugins-bad1, gst-rtsp-server, zopfli are in the official repo, and provide the shared libs which need to be in the common/shlibs file.

[Chocimier]

provide the shared libs which need to be in the common/shlibs

Wrong assumption, we usually do not list shared libs in shlibs unless used by other package.

Why does it matter?

Packages would likely need a revbump, and you added none in the PR what raised my question.

From my private repo.

Enough for me, but I'll like to hear opinion from other maintainers.

[abenson]

If these entries aren't needed for anything else that currently exists in void-packages, they can live on the same branch as your custom templates.

Additionally, these are unrelated to each other, and each one should be located within the file next to their similar entries (i.e. keep entries for gst-plugins-bad1 with the existing entries for gst-plugins-bad1.