Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

gnome-maps: update to 46.0. #49564

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 14, 2024
Merged

gnome-maps: update to 46.0. #49564

merged 2 commits into from
Apr 14, 2024

Conversation

fanyx
Copy link
Contributor

@fanyx fanyx commented Mar 27, 2024 •
edited

Testing the changes

  • I tested the changes in this PR: NO

Local build testing

  • I built this PR locally for my native architecture, (x86_64-glibc)
  • I built this PR locally for these architectures (if supported. mark crossbuilds):

@fanyx
Copy link
Contributor Author

fanyx commented Mar 27, 2024

@oreo639 can you point me to how i disable G_DISABLE_ASSERT
feels like this would be disabled by default

@classabbyamp classabbyamp marked this pull request as ready for review March 27, 2024 15:21
@classabbyamp classabbyamp marked this pull request as draft March 27, 2024 15:22
@fanyx fanyx force-pushed the gnome-maps branch 2 times, most recently from 7f5802a to a4cb069 Compare March 27, 2024 15:30
@fanyx fanyx marked this pull request as ready for review March 27, 2024 15:37
@fanyx fanyx changed the title gnome-maps: update to 1.2.0. gnome-maps: update to 46.0. Mar 28, 2024
@oreo639 oreo639 merged commit 2a51d8e into void-linux:master Apr 14, 2024
8 checks passed
@fanyx fanyx deleted the gnome-maps branch April 20, 2024 13:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@oreo639 oreo639 oreo639 left review comments

@chrysos349 chrysos349 chrysos349 left review comments

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@fanyx @oreo639 @chrysos349