Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

gedit{,-plugins}: update to 47.0 #50113

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jun 25, 2024
Merged

gedit{,-plugins}: update to 47.0 #50113

merged 7 commits into from
Jun 25, 2024

Conversation

chrysos349
Copy link
Contributor

@chrysos349 chrysos349 commented Apr 29, 2024

@Gottox
@mtboehlke

tepl was renamed to libgedit-tepl.

Testing the changes

  • I tested the changes in this PR: briefly

Local build testing

  • I built this PR locally for my native architecture, (x86_64)
  • I built this PR locally for these architectures (if supported. mark crossbuilds):
    • aarch64-musl x
    • armv7l x
    • armv6l-musl x

@chrysos349 chrysos349 force-pushed the gedit branch 2 times, most recently from c813965 to bf48868 Compare May 9, 2024 06:15
@mtboehlke
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good to me! I build with these changes locally and briefly tested gedit and gnome-latex with no issues.

Do you know if gnome-latex is getting a release soon that would make the patching unnecessary?

I saw that gtk3 is listed as an optional dependency for libgedit-gfls on its repo, but I couldn't get it to build without it. Maybe it could become just a check dependency if something like that PR is merged?

I think the transitional dummy package is the right way to handle the tepl change, and probably what I should have done with amtk.

@oreo639
Copy link
Member

oreo639 commented Jun 24, 2024

Making tepl a transitional package is not necessary. The tepl package provided libtepl.so.*, whereas libgedit-tepl is provides only libgedit-tepl.so.*.

Just add libgedit-tepl as a new package, add a commit to remove tepl.

@oreo639 oreo639 merged commit d690dc7 into void-linux:master Jun 25, 2024
5 of 8 checks passed
@chrysos349 chrysos349 deleted the gedit branch June 25, 2024 20:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants