Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Automated cherry pick of #638: Remove duplicated check in jobEnqueueableFn of proportion #641

Conversation

k82cn
Copy link
Member

@k82cn k82cn commented Dec 25, 2019

Cherry pick of #638 on release-0.3.

#638: Remove duplicated check in jobEnqueueableFn of proportion

@volcano-sh-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: k82cn

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@volcano-sh-bot volcano-sh-bot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Dec 25, 2019
@k82cn k82cn closed this Dec 25, 2019
@k82cn k82cn deleted the automated-cherry-pick-of-#638-upstream-release-0.3 branch December 25, 2019 13:16
@TravisBuddy
Copy link

Hey @k82cn,
Something went wrong with the build.

TravisCI finished with status errored, which means the build failed because of something unrelated to the tests, such as a problem with a dependency or the build process itself.

View build log

TravisBuddy Request Identifier: 26ed6820-2719-11ea-9fe8-03452f69915b

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants