Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PCB 4in1 #80

Open
Tomkanovik opened this issue Jan 20, 2018 · 8 comments
Open

PCB 4in1 #80

Tomkanovik opened this issue Jan 20, 2018 · 8 comments

Comments

@Tomkanovik
Copy link

Does enyone have PCB 4in1 with efficient use of space? Please send me link for it.

@ps915
Copy link

ps915 commented Feb 16, 2018

Like this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=avLRJ5z0UP4

I am working on it. Hopefully released soon. Actually found one little think i must change on the PCB, rest is working

@ps915
Copy link

ps915 commented Feb 16, 2018

2018-02-13 22 04 22

@Tomkanovik
Copy link
Author

yes like this it is very nice :)

@targetdozer
Copy link

targetdozer commented Mar 26, 2018

What is the Status of the 4 in one? I will build up a Chorus for our Team. PCBs are new to me, so I would like to get some ready to order.
One question to your Layouts (8in1 and 4in1): Why do you mount the receivers with the covered side up?
voroshkov writes:
Assembly of a Solo device
Correct positioning of RX5808 module against the finish gate area is vital for correct measurements.
I tried using different types of antennas and shields with RX5808 to achieve the best possible accuracy, and finally found that the module itself works as a short-range directional antenna.

The non-shielded side of the module is a surface that should face the gate, so consider this fact upon assembling.

@ps915
Copy link

ps915 commented Jun 10, 2018

Here you go:
https://github.com/ps915/Chorus-RF-Laptimer-PCB

can be closed now?

@ALopes90
Copy link

@ps915 the @targetdozer question is a very valid one, the "The non-shielded side of the module is supposed to face the gate?" I saw many people building one way and other building the other way, can't anyone test using it? I already order everything to build a 4 in 1 and I will make a 3D printable box to use with it and share it, but depending the way it needs to face the box with be different. Thanks

@voroshkov
Copy link
Owner

I used both sides (practical use on our local events, which last from morning till evening). Both work fine.
I guess there may be differences, but someone needs to invent a method of testing to check which is more accurate ;)

@ALopes90
Copy link

Ok Thanks, Good work

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants