Resolve errors with Labelbox integration #3323
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## release/v0.21.5 #3323 +/- ##
==================================================
Coverage ? 15.54%
==================================================
Files ? 565
Lines ? 69518
Branches ? 682
==================================================
Hits ? 10804
Misses ? 58714
Partials ? 0
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
ehofesmann
added
bug
brimoor
approved these changes
Jul 21, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Labelbox has now fully deprecated "Queue mode" in favor of "batch mode". Previously, attempting to use the Labelbox integration would result in an error, this PR updates the integration to use batch mode and brings the integration back to its previous state.
Resolves #2654