Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

release 4.0.0 #139

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

release 4.0.0 #139

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

bastelfreak
Copy link
Member

Pull Request (PR) description

This Pull Request (PR) fixes the following issues

@alexjfisher
Copy link
Member

Is there anything else you want to do before our first release?

eg.

  • README still refers to Centos 5
  • Mention the migration to VP in the README
  • Data types? (especially if adding them is likely to be a breaking change).

Copy link
Member

@alexjfisher alexjfisher left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The README mentions several deprecated parameters that will be removed in version 4.0.0.

We should remove them before releasing 4.0.0.

@dhollinger
Copy link
Member

@alexjfisher @bastelfreak - is there anything still needed for this to get merged?

@alexjfisher
Copy link
Member

There are still a couple of deprecated parameters that are documented as going to be removed in 4.0.0

@alexjfisher
Copy link
Member

Here's some more info. #53

@alexjfisher
Copy link
Member

If I'm reading all of that correctly, the plan was to remove 'traditional access control' completely in version 4.0? But that was then (2015). Do we still want to do this?

@razorsedge - Do you still think this is something that should be done? If we are to do this, before the first VP release is the ideal opportunity.

@alexjfisher
Copy link
Member

More info in 84bab50

@alexjfisher
Copy link
Member

alexjfisher commented Oct 17, 2018

Ping @ekohl
Any thoughts?

@trevor-vaughan
Copy link

@alexjfisher Please don't remove traditional access control. I agree that the new methods are best but there are still a lot of old systems out there that you may break.

@alexjfisher
Copy link
Member

@trevor-vaughan Old versions of net-snmp that don't support VACM on OSes that we support?

@Dan33l
Copy link
Member

Dan33l commented Nov 8, 2018

duplicate with #162

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants