Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

stub: add support for stub-first stub zone option #322

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Sep 22, 2023

Conversation

irregulator
Copy link
Contributor

@irregulator irregulator commented Sep 21, 2023

Pull Request (PR) description

Add support for stub-first stub zone option, which defaults to false.
It allows queries to be attempted again without the stub clause if
they failed with stub.

This Pull Request (PR) fixes the following issues

Add support for stub-first stub zone option, which default to false.
It allows queries to be attempted again without the stub clause if
they failed with stub.
@irregulator
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm not quite sure why static validation fails, but I'll be happy to get feedback on how to fix it.

@kenyon
Copy link
Member

kenyon commented Sep 21, 2023

It's saying that REFERENCE.md is outdated: https://github.com/voxpupuli/puppet-unbound/pull/322/checks#step:5:204

All of the documentation comments need to be updated to the new format: https://www.puppet.com/docs/puppet/8/puppet_strings.html

@irregulator
Copy link
Contributor Author

irregulator commented Sep 22, 2023

It's saying that REFERENCE.md is outdated: https://github.com/voxpupuli/puppet-unbound/pull/322/checks#step:5:204

All of the documentation comments need to be updated to the new format: https://www.puppet.com/docs/puppet/8/puppet_strings.html

Thanks @kenyon .

Add a spec test for the newly introduced stub-first option.
@irregulator
Copy link
Contributor Author

Okay I got static validations to pass. Now it's Centos 8 that's failing: https://github.com/voxpupuli/puppet-unbound/actions/runs/6275268917/job/17042416969

from the output am not sure if the timeout means that the acceptance command was never executed in the container or it was actually executed and failed.

Any hints?

@kenyon
Copy link
Member

kenyon commented Sep 22, 2023

That looks like a temporary network error. I just reran the job.

@kenyon kenyon added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 22, 2023
@kenyon kenyon merged commit 00fbc2c into voxpupuli:master Sep 22, 2023
12 checks passed
@irregulator
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants