Differences between epaper-breakout.pdf and bom.csv

[kubasienki]

Hi,
bom.csv lists designators which are non existent on the board and also is not coherent with epaper-breakout.pdf.

Here are differences that I've found:

designator	BOM	PDF
C6	4.7uF	0.33uF
R1	not listed	10kOhm
C7	0.1uF	0.33uF
C10	4.7uF	1uF
C11	100pF	1uF
C19, C20	1uF	not listed
L3, L4	22uH	not listed
R8, R9	10kOhm	39kOhm
R19	10kOhm	not listed
R14	390kOhm	400kOhm
R16	300k	not listed
R17	27k	not listed
R18	110kOhm	not listed
U3	LT1945	L7915
U4	not listed	L7815

Which of these sources should be treated as the ground truth?

[kubasienki]

I believe the bom is the incorrect one. Also I have ordered a boards from previous gerbers (23/10/2020) which were located here: hardware/epaper-breakout/gerbers . Since then they were upgraded. I'm looking at historical commit (from 1/9/2020) - where can I find the good part list with the designators?

[kubasienki]

I've used sch from the project. Now the issue is just about false bom.

[vroland]

Hi,
Sorry, the PDF seems to be really old... I assume the version you used was 1497a12?
Which BOM file did you look at? For this point in time, the matching BOM should be https://github.com/vroland/epdiy/blob/1497a12b01c8fc17ebd56f5eb268dcaee88a8aa8/hardware/epaper-breakout/epaper-breakout.csv.

[kubasienki]

I've finally created my own bom from the kicad file :)
But it seems like the one you provided looks the same.

Maybe a good idea would be to have revisions separated in folders? I mean v2, v2 new, v3?