Igel 1.9.2
What's new:
- Tuning of evaluation parameters
Relative strength compared to previous versions of Igel in 10+0.1 time control:
Rank Name Elo +/- Games Score Draws
0 Igel 1.9.2 64 POPCNT 212 6 14000 77.2% 21.0%
1 Igel 1.9.1 64 POPCNT -35 16 1000 45.0% 46.4%
2 Igel 1.9.0 64 POPCNT -61 16 1000 41.3% 43.6%
3 Igel 1.8.3 64 POPCNT -128 20 1000 32.4% 24.5%
4 Igel 1.8.2 64 POPCNT -175 20 1000 26.8% 24.8%
5 Igel 1.8.0 64 POPCNT -197 21 1000 24.3% 23.2%
6 Igel 1.5.0 64 POPCNT -226 22 1000 21.4% 21.0%
7 Igel 1.7.0 64 POPCNT -241 23 1000 20.0% 17.5%
8 Igel 1.6.0 64 POPCNT -254 23 1000 18.8% 18.0%
9 Igel 1.4.2 64 POPCNT -255 24 1000 18.8% 16.3%
10 Igel 1.5.1 64 POPCNT -268 24 1000 17.6% 15.8%
11 Igel 1.4 64 POPCNT -297 26 1000 15.3% 11.6%
12 Igel 1.4.1 64 POPCNT -300 27 1000 15.1% 11.0%
13 Igel 1.2 64 POPCNT -352 29 1000 11.7% 10.9%
14 Igel 1.3 64 POPCNT -366 30 1000 10.8% 9.5%
Relative strength compared to top 50 engines in 10+0.1 time control:
Rank Name Elo +/- Games Score Draws
0 Igel 1.9.2 64 POPCNT -296 8 10000 15.4% 16.3%
1 Stockfish 10 64 POPCNT 739 44 2500 98.6% 2.5%
2 Ethereal 11.50 (POPCNT) 513 24 2500 95.0% 8.2%
3 RubiChess 1.5 259 14 2500 81.6% 22.8%
4 Cheng 4.39 93 11 2500 63.1% 31.8%
Relative strength compared to GreKo in CCRL 40/4 time control:
Score of Igel 1.9.2 64 POPCNT vs GreKo 2018.08: 71 - 9 - 20 [0.810] 100
Elo difference: 251.89 +/- 73.51