Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: port CodeGroup & CodeBlock to vitepress #232

Conversation

d-pollard
Copy link

This PR brings parity to VitePress in terms of CodeGroup and CodeBlock

Some questions I have:

Where should CodeGroup and CodeBlock be registered? Currently, I have them in src/client/app/index.ts but it feels misplaced; please advise

Also, this still needs a bit of styling so if someone wants to help or point me in the right direction, that would be super helpful

Thanks,
Derek

@d-pollard d-pollard changed the title Port CodeGroup & CodeBlock to vitepress feat: port CodeGroup & CodeBlock to vitepress Feb 10, 2021
@d-pollard d-pollard force-pushed the feature/2021-02-09_port-code-group-code-block_dp branch from 63288cb to e1fe1de Compare February 10, 2021 19:29
@posva posva added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 8, 2021
@yyx990803 yyx990803 added the theme Related to the theme label Jan 6, 2022
@d-pollard
Copy link
Author

@posva / @yyx990803 what can I do to help this get merged in?

@kiaking
Copy link
Member

kiaking commented May 23, 2022

Thank you so much for your PR! And definitely we want this feature. But since we've started the next-theme development, let's do it overthere. Also, Vue.js website has implemented this too so I'm planning to import this from there 👍

@kiaking kiaking closed this May 23, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 21, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
enhancement New feature or request theme Related to the theme
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants