Fix advanced search filter operator handling. #2992
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
xmorave2
approved these changes
Jul 17, 2023
bpalme
pushed a commit
to bpalme/vufind
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 5, 2023
- Resolves VUFIND-1623.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
VUFIND-1623 revealed a bug where non-AND Boolean operators in filters were not accounted for correctly on the advanced search screen. This PR fixes the problem with the help of a new view helper, applies that helper in another place where it is relevant, and adds missing operator labels when necessary.
TODO