-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 50
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Continue processing #34
Comments
There should be checkpointing during optimization, but I will check if
there’s a bug. There are multiple stages of optimization so if it’s already
finished one of them, it will just skip it and move on to the next one.
…On Thu, Aug 3, 2023 at 3:22 PM Carlos Barreto ***@***.***> wrote:
Is there a possibility to stop processing and continue later?
I tried forcing the process to stop and them start again, but it usually
ends up without cotinuing processing, it seems that it sees that there was
something running before and just wraps up.
I'm asking that in case I need to stop the process and if I could conitnue
later, or in a case that I get a 'nan" value, if I could change the
learning rate and run again not loosing all the previous process that was
done
Thanks
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#34>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABLOKW2QICU4I66ILBMIVNTXTQQBZANCNFSM6AAAAAA3DMVCRI>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
just to be sure. I got the impression that it did in chunks. for exmaple, it splited the frames in "n" parts. it would do the step 1 to 4 in the frist part, then step 1 to 4 in part 2 and so on... the way you are saying, if I removed the step the it was not finished when I stopped the execution it would continue from the previous step? It could be enough, I'll study it more. |
Yes, in the last step of optimization, we optimize in chunks. We also have
some optimization phases to help initialize the main `motion_chunks` phase
of optimization. In any of these phases, if the optimization is
interrupted, it will resume from the step it last saved a checkpoint at.
…On Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 1:57 AM Carlos Barreto ***@***.***> wrote:
just to be sure.
for example, it does 4 steps. first it will do the full step 1 them step 2
and so on?
I got the impression that it did in chunks. for exmaple, it splited the
frames in "n" parts. it would do the step 1 to 4 in the frist part, then
step 1 to 4 in part 2 and so on...
the way you are saying, if I removed the step the it was not finished when
I stopped the execution it would continue from the previous step?
It could be enough, I'll study it more.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#34 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABLOKW6PFSUR2H6QHM65T7TXTS2QRANCNFSM6AAAAAA3DMVCRI>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
So if I remove the last chunk (probably not completed if I manually stopped the process and I had some sort of error), theorically it should work? I'll give it a try anyway |
Is there a possibility to stop processing and continue later?
I tried forcing the process to stop and them start again, but it usually ends up without cotinuing processing, it seems that it sees that there was something running before and just wraps up.
I'm asking that in case I need to stop the process and if I could conitnue later, or in a case that I get a 'nan" value, if I could change the learning rate and run again not loosing all the previous process that was done
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: