Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test set of KITTI-360 #8

Open
kazuto1011 opened this issue May 31, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Test set of KITTI-360 #8

kazuto1011 opened this issue May 31, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@kazuto1011
Copy link

Thanks for the codes! I would like to implement your evaluation protocol for KITTI-360 experiments. According to your paper, the test set comprises 30,758 frames from the first two sequences.

We split the dataset into two parts, where the first two sequences (30,758 frames) are the testing set, and the rest are used for training and cross-validation.

And in this repository a dataset class parses 0000_sync and 0001_sync filenames.

if split == "train":
self.full_list = list(filter(lambda file: '0000_sync' not in file and '0001_sync' not in file, full_list))
else:
self.full_list = list(filter(lambda file: '0000_sync' in file or '0001_sync' in file, full_list))

However, since KITTI-360 did not release 0001_sync, the dataset class just parses 0000_sync (11,518 frames).
I think the number 30,758 may be from the actual serial sequences 0000_sync (11,518) and 0002_sync (19,240).
Which is correct for evaluation, 11,518 or 30,758 frames?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant