New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[USE CASE] Open Skills Assertion #7
Comments
It's interesting that you chose to categorize the skill definer as an issuer. Suggestion to unpack that language when we get to the discussion. Can you please add some details about the verification/consumption of the skills assertion? |
I think of the "Class" of an entity that "publishes stuff" related to credentials. Sometimes the "stuff" is assertions, sometimes it's defined achievements, sometimes it's skill definitions. I've used the term
As a verifier, I may receive a (presentation of a) credential from a holder that expresses a skill assertion. I inspect it with respect to these questions:
|
Actor
Issuer
Submitter
Nate Otto, Badgr/Concentric Sky
User Story
As an issuer I would like to recognize that a learner holds a particular skill, for which a definition exists that was published by a neutral third party, such as an industry consortium.
This is distinct from the well known defined credential use case, in which the entity that publishes the credential definition is the only one who may issue that credential. A relying party must evaluate, "Is this credential and the issuer that offers trustworthy, and is the credential a good fit for my needs?"
In the Open Skills Assertion use case, the trust model is different, and a relying party must ask, "Is this skill definition the one I am looking for, and is this assertion's issuer a trustworthy issuer to be able to recognize this skill to my needs?" It's not necessary to
Data Concepts
Tags
Tag Details
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: