You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If 'Vision for the W3C' stays (see #4), it would be good to emphasise that we come to consensus as a whole community, based upon shared principles -- e.g., in a separate bullet point.
I suggest this because we're seeing a concerning trend of folks suggest that WG charters should be treated as contractual -- that once they're given a letter of marque (as it were), they have the right to public a Recommendation, even if implications that go against principles and/or consensus are found after chartering.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If 'Vision for the W3C' stays (see #4), it would be good to emphasise that we come to consensus as a whole community, based upon shared principles -- e.g., in a separate bullet point.
I suggest this because we're seeing a concerning trend of folks suggest that WG charters should be treated as contractual -- that once they're given a letter of marque (as it were), they have the right to public a Recommendation, even if implications that go against principles and/or consensus are found after chartering.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: