Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Easier-to-use competitors #16

Open
dbooth-boston opened this issue Dec 7, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

Easier-to-use competitors #16

dbooth-boston opened this issue Dec 7, 2018 · 0 comments
Labels
Category: usage For issues around RDF usage in practice website Central RDF website should address this

Comments

@dbooth-boston
Copy link
Collaborator

"By way of comparison, I just now used Airtable to build my book
cataloging proposal in 2 intuitive, friendly hours and I can readily see how to
extend it to serve my problem domain. . . . [In] roughly the same time it takes to grok one of
the 1-5 standards one has to read to use RDF*, I have something that I can
provide as a read-only share to anyone reading this post:
https://airtable.com/shrJILw0CTILV0My2
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2018Nov/0229.html
@dbooth-boston dbooth-boston added the Category: usage For issues around RDF usage in practice label Dec 8, 2018
@dbooth-boston dbooth-boston added the website Central RDF website should address this label Mar 11, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Category: usage For issues around RDF usage in practice website Central RDF website should address this
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@dbooth-boston