Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Wide Review of 9 July WD of IFT #193

Open
1 of 7 tasks
svgeesus opened this issue Jul 24, 2024 · 9 comments
Open
1 of 7 tasks

Wide Review of 9 July WD of IFT #193

svgeesus opened this issue Jul 24, 2024 · 9 comments
Assignees
@svgeesus
Labels
Priority: Eventually Long-term issue, not outside SLO

Comments

@svgeesus
Copy link
Contributor

svgeesus commented Jul 24, 2024 •
edited
Loading

This meta-issue tracks the wide review of the 9 July Working Draft of IFT

The new draft addresses review feedback from the earlier proposals. There is no longer a Range Request vs Patch Subset choice, and there is no longer any special protocol required. Compared to the earlier proposals, the risks of fingerprinting have been reduced and there should no longer be an impact on CDN caching.

Because this is a substantial rewrite, we have an Explainer. For the same reason, the FPWD review of Patch Subset is now closed.
@svgeesus svgeesus self-assigned this Jul 24, 2024
@svgeesus
Copy link
Contributor Author

A11y review requested 10 July 2024

@svgeesus
Copy link
Contributor Author

Security review requested 10 July 2024

@svgeesus
Copy link
Contributor Author

Privacy review requested 24 July 2024

@svgeesus
Copy link
Contributor Author

I18n review requested 24 July 2024

@svgeesus
Copy link
Contributor Author

Web Perf WG review requested 24 July 2024

@svgeesus
Copy link
Contributor Author

IETF HTTP WG review requested 24 July 2024

@svgeesus
Copy link
Contributor Author

Issue raised by IETF HTTP WG:

Response to our request for review:

@svgeesus
Copy link
Contributor Author

svgeesus commented Aug 3, 2024

Response from Yoav Weiss, WebPerf WG

@svgeesus svgeesus added the Priority: Eventually Long-term issue, not outside SLO label Aug 28, 2024
@svgeesus
Copy link
Contributor Author

I18n review completed, no issues

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@svgeesus svgeesus

Labels
Priority: Eventually Long-term issue, not outside SLO
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@svgeesus