Mark features that might expose accessibility tools

[w3cbot]

This is a tracker issue. Only discuss things here if they are a11y group internal meta-discussions about the issue. Contribute to the actual discussion at the following link:

§ w3c/strategy#459

[matatk]

This was discussed on the APA WG call today (minutes).

Note that there's a PING tracking issue too: w3cping/tracking-issues#456

[matatk]

I had an additional thought on this since the APA WG call: what is an AT? For some users, an AT may be an application or OS setting change that is not necessarily specialist installed software or hardware. (Though I take the point that this initiative is most likely trying to protect the people who have more profound, rather than moderate, access needs.)

[matatk]

A few other threads where discussion has been taking place:

• tracking/icon for features that might expose use of accessibility tools whatwg/infra#636
• Add question about whether new features allow for accessibility device use to be learned w3ctag/security-questionnaire#157
• Accessible Rich Internet Applications 1.3 2024-02-01 w3cping/privacy-request#131