-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 60
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
as:verb - consequences of using blank node identifier (eg. _:post) #36
Comments
http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdf-interfaces/#triples
http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdf-interfaces/#blank-nodes
|
Mapping to a blank node is important for preventing data loss through initial JSON-LD expansion. Yes, there are issues, but it keeps data from being dropped on the floor. The "proper" solution is for the terms to be defined in a @context but without such a @context mapping to blank nodes gives us an interim solution. |
resulution same as in #23 |
Discussion started in issues#23
TL;DR during processing RDF we can't depend on identifiable blank nodes identifiers, also related to persisting in triple stores "seeAlso": "levelgraph/levelgraph-jsonld#8 (comment)"
"as:cc": ["@jasnell", "@lanthaler", "@gkellogg"]
@elfpavlik will report after #17 -> automated testing runs <- #32
"seeAlso": " https://github.com/bergos/rdf-ext/issues/3"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: