Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Initial write-up of Apache Streams #356

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

steveblackmon
Copy link

This document reflects the proposed feature set of AS 2.0 which is currently implemented in Apache Streams using AS 1.0

Apache Streams (incubating) supports the efforts of the Social Working Group to publish AS 2.0 as a formal specification. As more providers are added to Apache Streams and the variety of documents they produce increases, the project intends to align and remain aligned with the AS 2.0 vocubulary.

This document reflects the proposed feature set of AS 2.0 which is currently implemented in Apache Streams using AS 1.0

Apache Streams (incubating) supports the efforts of the Social Working Group to publish AS 2.0 as a formal specification.  As more providers are added to Apache Streams and the variety of documents they produce increases, the project intends to align and remain aligned with the AS 2.0 vocubulary.
@evanp
Copy link
Collaborator

evanp commented Aug 23, 2016

So, the main point of our implementation reports is to verify if and how implementations are using the features of this specification.

I think that an implementation report for AS1 is useful as input but probably doesn't fit with the implementation reports for AS2. I'd appreciate some feedback on this.

@steveblackmon
Copy link
Author

@evanp et all, this PR summarizes what the Apache Streams implementation report would look like if the community ported our existing functionality to support AS 2.0. There are plenty of other object and verb types that match up with endpoints from existing providers as yet un-utilized, or easily added to providers matching other popular SNS APIs. If we need to meet the criteria for basic AS 2.0 compatibility before merging, let's start a conversation about how we'll verify that has been achieved and I'll maintain the PR branch until we get there. It seems achievable to have AS 2.0 support in a release by the end of Q4 if we set after that soon.

@evanp evanp closed this May 9, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants