Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TPAC Followup re APA CR [this issue migrates from email to here to track] #234

Closed
ruoxiran opened this issue Dec 1, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed
Assignees
Labels
tag-tracker Group bringing to attention of the TAG, or tracked by the TAG but not needing response.

Comments

@ruoxiran
Copy link
Contributor

ruoxiran commented Dec 1, 2022

Email at: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Group/group-apa-chairs/2022Nov/0066.html

plain text as below:

Dear Rossen, Philippe, All:

Thank you for a helpful meeting during TPAC. In this followup I'm
setting aside procedural questions we raised during our meeting and
focussing instead on our next steps for our prospective WAI-Adapt
Candidate Recommendation draft.

FYI, or TPAC minutes are here:

https://www.w3.org/2022/09/13-apa-minutes.html#t01

My primary take-away was that we had too many, seemingly unrelated
attributes in the CR draft we'd put forward. I also recall hearing that
the AAC symbols attribute was the most "architecturally sound" of all
our proposed attributes.

What We Have Done Since

1.) We have dropped all attributes from our proposed CR except
symbol support. The current draft we hope to propose before the December
moratoriumis here:

https://w3c.github.io/adapt/symbols/

NOTE: By request of WHATWG (with whom we also met during TPAC:
https://www.w3.org/2022/09/13-apa-minutes.html#t03), this CR draft is
using the Adapt- prefix. See also this github issue:

#222

2.) Because we need normative reference to a symbols registry for
AAC symbols support, we are about to publish a FPWD of "WAI-Adapt
Registry for AAC Symbols:"

https://w3c.github.io/aac-registry/

NOTE: We have worked with Blissymbolics Communication International
(BCI) on this FPWD, because our approach brings their concept index to
web content.

3.) We continue to update our Explainer. Most specifically, all
references to advertising as a use case are now removed from the
Explainer. Instead, we are developing other use cases in cooperation
with the W3C Web for Children Community Group (among others):

https://www.w3.org/community/accessibility4children/

As we'd like to avoid returning to any kind of miscommunication with the
TAG, I am providing our plans in advance of proposing document
transitions. If you'd like any particular action before we move to CR
with AAC symbols, and to FPWD with a Registry for AAC symbols, please
advise.

Thanking you for your help,

Janina

@ruoxiran ruoxiran added the tag-tracker Group bringing to attention of the TAG, or tracked by the TAG but not needing response. label Dec 1, 2022
@ruoxiran
Copy link
Contributor Author

ruoxiran commented Dec 1, 2022

this issue related with CR transtion process for WAI-Adapt: Symbols Module, and also related with w3c/transitions#443 and w3ctag/design-reviews#476 .

@ruoxiran
Copy link
Contributor Author

ruoxiran commented Jan 3, 2023

TAG's minutes

@ruoxiran ruoxiran self-assigned this Jan 3, 2023
@ruoxiran ruoxiran closed this as completed Apr 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
tag-tracker Group bringing to attention of the TAG, or tracked by the TAG but not needing response.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant