Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated instances of "content/web/web application author/s" with "author/s" #2179

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 13, 2024

Conversation

giacomo-petri
Copy link
Contributor

@giacomo-petri giacomo-petri commented May 9, 2024

Closes #2175

Editorial: I've updated all the instances of:

  • content author/authors
  • web author/authors
  • application author/authors
  • web application author/authors

with simply "author/authors".

More details in #2175


Preview | Diff

@giacomo-petri giacomo-petri added the editorial a change to an example, note, spelling, grammar, or is related to publishing or the repo label May 9, 2024
@giacomo-petri giacomo-petri self-assigned this May 9, 2024
@pkra pkra merged commit 6faab4c into main May 13, 2024
4 checks passed
@pkra pkra added this to the 2024 milestone May 13, 2024
@pkra pkra deleted the giacomo-petri-author-terminology-editorial branch May 13, 2024 07:45
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request May 13, 2024
…hor/s" (#2179)

SHA: 6faab4c
Reason: push, by pkra

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
editorial a change to an example, note, spelling, grammar, or is related to publishing or the repo
Projects
ARIA 1.3
Awaiting triage
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Usage of "content author" vs. "author"
3 participants