Ac review #29
Ac review #29
Conversation
Draft-2018-TTWG-Charter.html
Outdated
| @@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ <h2>Coordination</h2> | |||
| Invitation for review must be issued during each major standards-track | |||
| document transition, including <a href="https://www.w3.org/2018/Process-20180201/#RecsWD" | |||
|
|
|||
| title="First Public Working Draft">FPWD</a> and at least 3 months | |||
| title="First Public Working Draft">FPWD</a> and should be issued at least 3 months | |||
| before <a href="https://www.w3.org/2018/Process-20180201/#RecsCR" title="Candidate Recommendation">CR</a>, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
semi-colon or comma missing before should be issued at least 3 months
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Before the and should be issued at least I think?
Draft-2018-TTWG-Charter.html
Outdated
| @@ -589,7 +589,7 @@ <h2> Decision Policy </h2> | |||
| face-to-face meeting or teleconference will be considered provisional. | |||
| A call for consensus (CfC) will be issued for all resolutions (for | |||
| example, via email and/or web-based survey), with a response period | |||
| from one week to 10 working days, depending on the chair's evaluation | |||
| of 10 working days, depending on the chair's evaluation | |||
| of the group consensus on the issue. If no objections are raised on | |||
| the mailing list by the end of the response period, the resolution | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Shouldn't the following be removed now?
, depending on the chair's evaluation of the group consensus on the issue.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, please remove the , depending on the chair's evaluation of the group consensus on the issue since it is no longer applicable.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for preparing the pull request @plehegar - I agree with @palemieux that a couple of detail changes are needed still.
Draft-2018-TTWG-Charter.html
Outdated
| @@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ <h2>Coordination</h2> | |||
| Invitation for review must be issued during each major standards-track | |||
| document transition, including <a href="https://www.w3.org/2018/Process-20180201/#RecsWD" | |||
|
|
|||
| title="First Public Working Draft">FPWD</a> and at least 3 months | |||
| title="First Public Working Draft">FPWD</a> and should be issued at least 3 months | |||
| before <a href="https://www.w3.org/2018/Process-20180201/#RecsCR" title="Candidate Recommendation">CR</a>, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Before the and should be issued at least I think?
Draft-2018-TTWG-Charter.html
Outdated
| @@ -589,7 +589,7 @@ <h2> Decision Policy </h2> | |||
| face-to-face meeting or teleconference will be considered provisional. | |||
| A call for consensus (CfC) will be issued for all resolutions (for | |||
| example, via email and/or web-based survey), with a response period | |||
| from one week to 10 working days, depending on the chair's evaluation | |||
| of 10 working days, depending on the chair's evaluation | |||
| of the group consensus on the issue. If no objections are raised on | |||
| the mailing list by the end of the response period, the resolution | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, please remove the , depending on the chair's evaluation of the group consensus on the issue since it is no longer applicable.
|
changes requested by @palemieux done. Thank you for the thorough review! |
|
Thanks, looking good so far! |
This pull request addresses the ongoing feedback from the AC Review.