Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

关于括号 #537

Closed
xfq opened this issue Apr 20, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

关于括号 #537

xfq opened this issue Apr 20, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@xfq
Copy link
Member

xfq commented Apr 20, 2023

https://w3c.github.io/clreq/#n025

There are other brackets and quotation marks which include [此处省略,见原文]. These brackets and quotation marks are rarely used in Chinese publications.

关于这个note,我有两个问题:

  1. 中文版没有提到“These brackets and quotation marks are rarely used in Chinese publications.”
  2. 【】这对括号可能因为输入法支持较好,出现比其他列出的括号要更加常见,是否应该被列为例外呢?
@realfish
Copy link
Member

realfish commented Apr 20, 2023

  1. 【】这对括号可能因为输入法支持较好,出现比其他列出的括号要更加常见,是否应该被列为例外呢?

【】 比其他括号更常见,能展开描述一下么?

根据 GB/T 15834—2011 的描述和范例——

  • 方括号 []、六角括号 〔〕 的使用场景常见于:
    • 学术文献——例如在参考文献列表中标注国籍、朝代、出版物类型;
    • 公文/合同——例如文件编号中的年份;
    • 多层括号嵌套时,优化括号的配对(与 () 嵌套使用时,提高视觉区分度)。
  • 方头括号 【】 的使用场景常见于:
    • 新闻报道开头的格式化标记;
    • 辞书类文献的词条标记。

就使用场景来看,方头括号可能更贴近大众阅读,其他两组括号在专业类文献或公文/法律写作场景中更多见。但两类场景重要性难以区分高下,并且这三组括号在一定程度上可以互换使用,似乎不能判断哪一组更为「例外」?

@xfq xfq closed this as completed in 2b7793b Jun 2, 2023
@xfq
Copy link
Member Author

xfq commented Jun 2, 2023

根据会议讨论,删除了“These brackets and quotation marks are rarely used in Chinese publications”。

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants