Editorial: maybe blue tables? #193
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
oof it makes these tables awful: https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/w3c/core-aam/pull/193.html#mapping_events_selection edit: oh actually those tables are already bad. |
|
yeh... i mean, it sort of is what it is unless we want to think about whether tables are really the right way to convey this information in general? |
|
Definition lists seem like a better fit for many of theses cases. |
|
From a quick look, are the |
|
sorry, |
|
With break-all it looks better:
|
|
@spectranaut this has merge conflicts. Can we close this and revisit it some other time? |
|
yes @pkra ! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
whaddya think @scottaohara @jnurthen @pkra ?
Trying to get rid of custom CSS - this uses respec CSS for def tables
Preview | Diff