[css-flexbox][css-sizing] Move min-width and min-height partial definitions to css-sizing #1920
Comments
Makes sense to me. Agenda+ to get WG approval. |
The Working Group just discussed
The full IRC log of that discussion<TabAtkins> Topic: Sizing - moving min-width/height partial dfns to Sizing<astearns> github: https://github.com//issues/1920 <TabAtkins> fantasai: Oriol pointed out the Flexbox isn't the best place to define a new initial value for min-widht/height. <TabAtkins> fantasai: Suggested it move to the Sizing spec. Makes sense to me. <TabAtkins> fantasai: Definition of what automatic size means in Flexbox wills tay, but move the propdef that defines the keyword to Sizing. <TabAtkins> Rossen: Sounds reasonable. <TabAtkins> RESOLVED: Move definition of the min-width:auto keyword to Sizing. |
fantasai
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 5, 2017
…stence here; propdefs are now in css-sizing. #1920
triple-underscore
added a commit
to triple-underscore/triple-underscore.github.io
that referenced
this issue
Dec 5, 2017
…d import box-sizing. w3c/csswg-drafts@aab2632 Fixes w3c/csswg-drafts#1920 and fixes w3c/csswg-drafts#1906.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
CSS Flexbox provides partial definitions of
min-height
andmin-width
with the newauto
initial value.This kind of things should not be allowed. How is someone looking for the initial value of these properties supposed to know that it's defined in Flexbox?
So I think these definitions should be moved to wherever makes sense. Probably this would be css-box, but it seems it has been abandoned. So css-sizing seems the best option.
Then css-sizing would define
auto
as the initial value, and say that it represents the "automatic minimum size" which, unless otherwise defined by the layout model, is0
. CSS Flexbox and CSS Grid should only define this automatic minimum size in their layouts.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: