-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 639
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Stacking order + 'z-index' spec #4965
Comments
…o its own spec. (Currently active definition is in CSS2.) #4965
CSS2 seems to assume that stacking contexts can only be established by positioned elements with non- But now we have plenty of ways for that. Like the |
It should specify the resolution of #2717. |
Also, I'd probably name the spec "CSS Painting Model" or something along those lines. And it definitely needs to define terms for the various things that can happen (mentioned in the previous 2 comments) that other specs can hook into. |
…o its own spec. (Currently active definition is in CSS2.) w3c#4965
|
Painting order and stacking contexts are now in https://drafts.csswg.org/css-position-4/#painting-order, so I guess |
Oh yeah it should definitely live in Position. |
For now I think that's fine, though in the long term I think we should really have a CSS painting model spec (as discussed at least once in the past). |
I just edited the initial comment to include the other things that have been raised here, and in that other linked discussion. (The list more than doubled in length, I think.) |
Filing this issue to track that we need a stacking/painting order spec. Topics should include (note this list has been edited substantially since the issue was initially filed):
(Feel free to edit this description to add more tracking items, or comment below and I'll edit if you don't have permissions.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: