[css-align] editorial: typo in §6.2.2. Absolutely-Positioned Boxes

[MatsPalmgren]

https://drafts.csswg.org/css-align/#align-abspos
"(Otherwise, when align-content is not normal, ..."
I think align-content should be align-self there.

Ditto in 6.1.2 (it should be justify-self):
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-align/#justify-abspos

[MatsPalmgren]

Also, are you sure you really mean normal in those places?
The text makes more sense to me if you replace normal with stretch there,
i.e. "Otherwise, when align-self is not stretch, and not normal behaving as stretch, ...".
Currently, it seems to say that an explicit align-self:stretch should have fit-content sizing,
which seems odd. I'd expect it to have fill-available sizing.