-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 642
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[web-animations-1][web-animations-2] Move iterationComposite to web-animations-2 #4303
[web-animations-1][web-animations-2] Move iterationComposite to web-animations-2 #4303
Conversation
Antoine, Brian - not sure what we should do with WPT tests for |
I'd suggest marking them tentative for now, although perhaps longterm it would make sense to differentiate spec levels in wpt. I seem to recall ideas around including or referencing the test results from the spec at which point being able to differentiate spec level seems desirable. Thoughts, @foolip ? |
If level 2 is published somewhere then they need not be tentative. You can add a link to the spec and if you need to filter based on those links perhaps we can come up with something in wpt.fyi? |
I think this is a great idea! I'm not sure how widespread the use of the |
Feature request is at web-platform-tests/wpt.fyi#65. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me with the suggested changes.
This PR moves the
iterationComposite
concept from the level 1 spec to the level 2 spec, as motivated in #4300