[scroll-animations-1] Remove -attachment, add timeline-scope #8902
Conversation
w3c#7759 This is specifically the model summarized in: w3c#7759 (comment)
|
Heh. I actually have a partially completed fix for this on my system from yesterday also. :) We can merge the differences... |
| Value: [ <<'scroll-timeline-name'>> [ <<'scroll-timeline-axis'>> || <<'scroll-timeline-attachment'>> ]? ]# | ||
| Value: [ <<'scroll-timeline-name'>> [ <<'scroll-timeline-axis'>> ]? ]# |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Need to remove the now-extraneous brackets.
| Initial: local | ||
| <pre class='propdef shorthand'> | ||
| Name: view-timeline | ||
| Value: [ <<'view-timeline-name'>> [ <<'view-timeline-axis'>> ]? ]# |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Same here: don't need the brackets anymore.
| This [=view progress timeline=] name | ||
| [=attaches=] to the corresponding [=view progress timeline=] | ||
| defined on this box. | ||
| # Deferred Progress Timelines # {#deferred-timeline} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Same top-level comment as earlier: I think I'd prefer to cast this as a name-scoping mechanism.
Also, this ultimately needs to go into css-animations-2, not here. Might make sense for us to just draft it there, or at least in the Appendix in a way that's prepared to be moved over.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah, I'm not actively trying to annoy you by going in circles. I was a definitely unsure what to do here, since the issue notes appear to show an unresolved situation where everyone except you resolved on this model #7759 (comment) 🙃. But after conferring with Tab, they thought writing that model would be fine despite that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think the version in #8906 is functionally saying the same thing, just describing it differently. At least it's trying to ...
|
|
||
| <pre class='propdef'> | ||
| Name: timeline-scope | ||
| Value: none | [ <<dashed-ident>> ]# |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is partially mixing up the dashed-ident change into the timeline-scope change, which leaves the spec in a weird inconsistent state.
|
|
||
| <pre class="idl"> | ||
| [Exposed=Window] | ||
| partial interface Animation { | ||
| attribute CSSNumberish? startTime; | ||
| attribute CSSNumberish? currentTime; | ||
| attribute AnimationTimeline? timeline; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Afaict this is an unrelated change, so it should go into its own issue/PR.
|
OK, I've pushed my version to #8906 |
|
Closing in favor of #8906. |
#7759
This is specifically the model summarized in:
#7759 (comment)