New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DID Method Registration Resolution #2 on 2021-03-16 #271
Comments
I think the dates are a terrible idea, and we should close this issue and not implement this resolution... github tracks dates for us. |
we should resolve not to do this, and close the issue. |
The issue was discussed in a meeting on 2021-08-17 List of resolutions:
View the transcript6.5. DID Method Registration Resolution #2 on 2021-03-16 (issue did-spec-registries#271)See github issue did-spec-registries#271. Orie Steele: Similar scenario, this was about status and dates Manu Sporny: We have a resolution for first registered date, and last reviewed date Brent Zundel: Seemed like a good idea at that time Manu Sporny: Not sure if this is very useful Drummond Reed: I still think "first registered" is a good idea, but "last reviewed" doesn't seem to make sense
Ted Thibodeau Jr.: This is also overtaken by events. Orie Steele: We should just use Git, and resolve to not implement this resolution Joe Andrieu: The link that people click on may not be the one that was reviewed (unless we use hashlinks) Brent Zundel: There was a lot of conversation on liveness, and how up-to-date DID methods are.
Brent Zundel: Thanks everyone, we got through a lot of items. Cu next time. |
https://www.w3.org/2019/did-wg/Meetings/Minutes/2021-03-16-did-topic#resolution2
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: