Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DID Method Registration Resolution #2 on 2021-03-16 #271

Open
OR13 opened this issue Mar 23, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

DID Method Registration Resolution #2 on 2021-03-16 #271

OR13 opened this issue Mar 23, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@OR13
Copy link
Contributor

OR13 commented Mar 23, 2021

Update the registration table to include, status, first registered date, last reviewed date

https://www.w3.org/2019/did-wg/Meetings/Minutes/2021-03-16-did-topic#resolution2

@OR13 OR13 changed the title Resolution #2 on 2021-03-16: Update the registration table to include, status, first registered date, last reviewed date DID Method Registration Resolution #2 on 2021-03-16 Mar 23, 2021
@OR13
Copy link
Contributor Author

OR13 commented Aug 17, 2021

I think the dates are a terrible idea, and we should close this issue and not implement this resolution... github tracks dates for us.

@OR13
Copy link
Contributor Author

OR13 commented Aug 17, 2021

we should resolve not to do this, and close the issue.

@iherman
Copy link
Member

iherman commented Aug 17, 2021

The issue was discussed in a meeting on 2021-08-17

List of resolutions:

  • Resolution No. 4: We are not going to add dates in a table to the DID Registry
View the transcript

6.5. DID Method Registration Resolution #2 on 2021-03-16 (issue did-spec-registries#271)

See github issue did-spec-registries#271.

Orie Steele: Similar scenario, this was about status and dates
… We can do status with labels, not sure what to do about dates
… Either we need new proposals for handling dates, or decide that we will not implement the resolution

Manu Sporny: We have a resolution for first registered date, and last reviewed date

Brent Zundel: Seemed like a good idea at that time

Manu Sporny: Not sure if this is very useful

Drummond Reed: I still think "first registered" is a good idea, but "last reviewed" doesn't seem to make sense

Markus Sabadello: This can be reconstructed from Git history?

Ted Thibodeau Jr.: This is also overtaken by events.
… We registered DID methods before we had even finalized the requirements for DID methods.

Orie Steele: We should just use Git, and resolve to not implement this resolution

Joe Andrieu: The link that people click on may not be the one that was reviewed (unless we use hashlinks)

Brent Zundel: There was a lot of conversation on liveness, and how up-to-date DID methods are.

Proposed resolution: We are not going to add dates in a table to the DID Registry (Brent Zundel)

Ivan Herman: +1

Manu Sporny: +1

Brent Zundel: +1

Drummond Reed: +1

Orie Steele: +1

Charles Lehner: +1

Dave Longley: +1

Shigeya Suzuki: +1

Markus Sabadello: +1

Ted Thibodeau Jr.: +1

Resolution #4: We are not going to add dates in a table to the DID Registry

Drummond Reed: Thanks Brent. Big high five to Joe and Daniel and also Orie.

Brent Zundel: Thanks everyone, we got through a lot of items. Cu next time.


Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants