These registries needs and Expert Review Required section.

[jonnycrunch]

This entire registry needs the "Expert Review Required" registration procedure similar to IETF's Section 16.11 and probably more importantly rather then invoke this cryptographic golem, that we should defer to IETF where the security considerations should be addressed and not try to create them here.

see: #79

@selfissued

[OR13]

@selfissued @jonnycrunch can you make a concret proposal for the WG to consider?

[OR13]

I suggest closing, we probably still need to gather a larger group of folks to "help review".

[brentzundel]

as discussed in the call 7-27, we are closing this due to lack of feedback. and the existence of a registration process

[iherman]

The issue was discussed in a meeting on 2021-07-27

• no resolutions were taken

View the transcript

3.12. These registries needs and Expert Review Required section. (issue did-spec-registries#81)

See github issue did-spec-registries#81.

Orie Steele: We should close this due to lack of feedback.

Manu Sporny: Didn't we do some variation of this? We do have a registration procedure that people should follow, right? And we oversee that?

Brent Zundel: Hearing no opposition to closing this, we do have a registration procedure, close?

Manu Sporny: No objections.

Manu Sporny: Closing issue 81.