You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
dcterms:hasPart is re-used in DCAT as the generic relationship between a dcat:Catalog and the listed dcat:Resource's, i.e., to specify that a given element (dcat:Resource) is in a given set (dcat:Catalog).
The problem is that dcterms:hasPart, as per its DCTERMS definition, may indicate either an element in a set or a subset. This may raise issues in the use of this property, e.g., to specify relationships between a catalogue and its subsets (sub-catalogues), as reported in #1454
The proposal is as follows:
Revise §6.3.3 by replacing dcterms:hasPart with a specific property dcat:resource. It will be sub-property of dcterms:hasPart, with domain dcat:Catalog and range dcat:Resource.
Revise properties dcat:dataset, dcat:service, and dcat:catalog to make them sub-properties of dcat:resource.
I am in favour of this proposal, doing so we leave dcterms:hasPart for Loosely structured catalog, and we have specific subproperties for more specific use cases.
dcterms:hasPart
is re-used in DCAT as the generic relationship between adcat:Catalog
and the listeddcat:Resource
's, i.e., to specify that a given element (dcat:Resource
) is in a given set (dcat:Catalog
).The problem is that
dcterms:hasPart
, as per its DCTERMS definition, may indicate either an element in a set or a subset. This may raise issues in the use of this property, e.g., to specify relationships between a catalogue and its subsets (sub-catalogues), as reported in #1454The proposal is as follows:
dcterms:hasPart
with a specific propertydcat:resource
. It will be sub-property ofdcterms:hasPart
, with domaindcat:Catalog
and rangedcat:Resource
.dcat:dataset
,dcat:service
, anddcat:catalog
to make them sub-properties ofdcat:resource
.dcterms:hasPart
underdcat:Resource
.The proposal is implemented via PR #1470
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: