Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

DCAT: s/getCapabilities/GetCapabilities/ #961

Closed
andrea-perego opened this issue Jun 26, 2019 · 5 comments
Closed

DCAT: s/getCapabilities/GetCapabilities/ #961

andrea-perego opened this issue Jun 26, 2019 · 5 comments
Labels
dcat Editorial feedback Issues stemming from external feedback to the WG
Projects
DCAT revision
Milestone
DCAT CR

Comments

@andrea-perego
Copy link
Contributor

Submitted by James Passmore (@nmtoken) on 26 Jun 2019:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-comments/2019Jun/0004.html

Quoting:

" An endpoint description may be expressed in a machine-readable form, such as an OpenAPI (Swagger) description [OpenAPI], an OGC getCapabilities response [WFS], [ISO-19142], [WMS], [ISO-19128], a SPARQL Service Description [SPARQL11-SERVICE-DESCRIPTION], an [OpenSearch] or [WSDL20] document, a Hydra API description [HYDRA], else in text or some other informal mode if a formal representation is not possible. "

"getCapabilities" should be "GetCapabilities". OGC specs tell us this parameter value is case sensitive.
@andrea-perego andrea-perego added dcat feedback Issues stemming from external feedback to the WG labels Jun 26, 2019
@andrea-perego andrea-perego added this to the DCAT CR milestone Jun 26, 2019
@andrea-perego andrea-perego added this to To do in DCAT revision via automation Jun 26, 2019
andrea-perego added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 27, 2019
@andrea-perego
s/getCapabilities/GetCapabilities/
54981a9 
As per #961
@andrea-perego andrea-perego mentioned this issue Jun 27, 2019
Merged
@andrea-perego
Copy link
Contributor Author

Suggested revision implemented in PR #964

DCAT revision automation moved this from To do to Done Jun 30, 2019
@andrea-perego
Copy link
Contributor Author

@agbeltran , I suggest we keep this issue open until James confirms he's happy with the revision.

@agbeltran agbeltran reopened this Jul 1, 2019
DCAT revision automation moved this from Done to In progress Jul 1, 2019
@agbeltran
Copy link
Member

good point, issue re-opened...

@andrea-perego
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks, @agbeltran . I just informed James about the implemented revision:

https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-comments/2019Jul/0000.html

@andrea-perego andrea-perego mentioned this issue Jul 1, 2019
Closed
@agbeltran
Copy link
Member

Replied by James agreeing with the revision:
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-comments/2019Jul/0002.html

Closing issue now.

DCAT revision automation moved this from In progress to Done Jul 2, 2019
agbeltran added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 6, 2019
@agbeltran
More Spanish translations and addressing issue #961
164ad13
@agbeltran agbeltran mentioned this issue Jul 6, 2019
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
dcat Editorial feedback Issues stemming from external feedback to the WG
Projects
DCAT revision
  
Done
Milestone
DCAT CR
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@dr-shorthair @agbeltran @andrea-perego