Dataset series v2 (issue 1272)

[riccardoAlbertoni]

Draft including dcat:DatasetSeries as a new class as discussed in #1272.

• Adding dcat:DatasetSeries class description see https://raw.githack.com/w3c/dxwg/dcat-dataseries-issue1272/dcat/index.html#Class:Dataset_Series
• Revising guidelines about dataset series see https://raw.githack.com/w3c/dxwg/dcat-dataseries-issue1272/dcat/index.html#dataset-series
• Specific editorial questions are included to track doubts and editorial choices that we might want to discuss.

Diff: https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https%3A%2F%2Fw3c.github.io%2Fdxwg%2Fdcat%2F&doc2=https%3A%2F%2Fraw.githack.com%2Fw3c%2Fdxwg%2Fdcat-dataseries-issue1272%2Fdcat%2Findex.html

TODO: (once we have agreed on usage notes and definitions)

• update RDF
• update change history

[riccardoAlbertoni]

dcat:hasSeriesMember and dcat:inSeries replace dcterm:hasPart and dcterms:isPartof as discussed in #1307.

Still, some discussion about these properties names, which I have reported in issues #1307 (comment)

[riccardoAlbertoni]

The concerns from @agbeltran and @dr-shorthair have been addressed.

I would propose to merge this PR in the editorial draft as it includes many changes and it is useful to show these changes to commenters while we advance the discussion on the missing pieces (e.g., #1307 (comment))

[andrea-perego]

@riccardoAlbertoni said:

The concerns from @agbeltran and @dr-shorthair have been addressed.

I would propose to merge this PR in the editorial draft as it includes many changes and it is useful to show these changes to commenters while we advance the discussion on the missing pieces (e.g., #1307 (comment))

I suggest we wait until tomorrow's DCAT call, to see if we reach an agreement.

[riccardoAlbertoni]

• removed dcat:seriesMember in all the document ( as suggested in Should we specialize dcterms:hasPart for dcat:DatasetSeries? #1307)
• create a reference to issue Do we need a new property dcat:seriesMember defined as dcat:inSeries's inverse? #1335 asking if we need dcat:seriesMember
• added a short Editorial node at the beginning of dataset sections to give the gist of what has changed since the last publication draft (please double-check if I missed any important changes to mention in the editorial note)
• remove reference to issues that are mentioned in the editorial note

@andrea-perego @agbeltran @dr-shorthair @pwin @davebrowning: could any of you check I haven't missed anything and accept the PR?
This PR should close issue #1307 and likely also #1272.

[andrea-perego]

• removed dcat:seriesMember in all the document ( as suggested in Should we specialize dcterms:hasPart for dcat:DatasetSeries? #1307)
• create a reference to issue Do we need a new property dcat:seriesMember defined as dcat:inSeries's inverse? #1335 asking if we need dcat:seriesMember
• added a short Editorial node at the beginning of dataset sections to give the gist of what has changed since the last publication draft (please double-check if I missed any important changes to mention in the editorial note)
• remove reference to issues that are mentioned in the editorial note

@andrea-perego @agbeltran @dr-shorthair @pwin @davebrowning: could any of you check I haven't missed anything and accept the PR?
This PR should close issue #1307 and likely also #1272.

+1 from me. Thanks, @riccardoAlbertoni .

[riccardoAlbertoni]

Minor changes to making the references to issues consistent with those previously included in the document. Issue with a capital letter and # in front of numbers.

[riccardoAlbertoni]

@agbeltran: There is one old request for change from you blocking the merging. I think we have included your request. Could you unblock the merging accepting the PR? Thanks ;)

The changes required by @Alejandra were included. This is a stale change request.