Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Profiledesc working #198

Merged
merged 4 commits into from May 3, 2018

Conversation

Projects
None yet
6 participants
@rob-metalinkage
Copy link
Contributor

commented Apr 16, 2018

replace prof:resourceType with simeplified dct:conformsTo usage

@aisaac

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented Apr 17, 2018

Wondering what is the process for approving/merging this pull request?
I'm very much in favor of approving it, but I'm not sure who can do this in our profile work.

@dr-shorthair

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented Apr 18, 2018

See https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/GitHub_etiquette#Contributing_to_the_normative_deliverables
Since Rob submitted, he shouldn't merge. That leaves Nick.

@dr-shorthair

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented Apr 18, 2018

However, it has not yet been established if the profile-description work item is a formal (normative) deliverable, and who the editors are. @kcoyle @pwin this needs to be resolved in plenary perhaps? If not normative, then there are no rules ...

@dr-shorthair dr-shorthair requested a review from nicholascar Apr 18, 2018

@aisaac

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented Apr 18, 2018

@dr-shorthair I'm quite puzzled indeed. And the wiki page https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/GitHub_etiquette#Contributing_to_the_normative_deliverables does NOT list Lars, Rob and Ruben for another doc that they apparently edit (https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/profiles/). I'm going to try to send an email to the group list, maybe this PR is too specific for the discussion, as you hint.

@nicholascar

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented Apr 18, 2018

This profiledesc work is not yet accepted as DXWG work and will be formally considered at the F2F meeting.

@larsgsvensson

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented Apr 18, 2018

@dr-shorthair wrote

However, it has not yet been established if the profile-description work item is a formal (normative) deliverable, and who the editors are. @kcoyle @pwin this needs to be resolved in plenary perhaps? If not normative, then there are no rules ...

I thought it's part of the Guidance on publishing application profiles of vocabularies document in our charter...

@kcoyle

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented Apr 18, 2018

I'll chat with Peter about this, but I don't think that this has been discussed by the plenary group and I must say that it isn't clear to me how it fits in to DCAT. There is indeed a deliverable regarding profiles and it is separate from DCAT itself. My opinion is that it is quite premature to consider merging this, and the disposition of this is indeed what we should establish at the f2f.

@dr-shorthair dr-shorthair added this to In progress in Profile Guidance Apr 26, 2018

@nicholascar nicholascar merged commit 91b0368 into gh-pages May 3, 2018

Profile Guidance automation moved this from In progress to Done May 3, 2018

@rob-metalinkage

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor Author

commented May 3, 2018

Updates merged in to reflect conversations. (Cardinalities of properties probably need to be relaxed)

@kcoyle kcoyle removed this from Done in Profile Guidance Oct 23, 2018

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.