Dcat issue58 changing conformance examples to dwbp riccardo

[riccardoAlbertoni]

• Merging @aisaac and @andrea-perego contributions,
• Instance names start with lower case.
• Still some questions ( see Antoine's question in issue Data quality model [RDQM] #58) to answer

[aisaac]

There's still a couple of "conformat" and "nonConformat" in the text.
There's also maybe one problem with deriving conformance test plans from DWBP but I'm going to continue the discussion in #652 where @riccardoAlbertoni has answered me.

[andrea-perego]

@riccardoAlbertoni , could you please merge PR #666 ? It is just a minor ed change on config.js, to be aligned with gh-pages.

Thanks!

[riccardoAlbertoni]

@andrea-perego wrote:

@riccardoAlbertoni , could you please merge PR #666 ? It is just a minor ed change on config.js, to be aligned with gh-pages.

Done!

@aisaac wrote

There's still a couple of "conformat" and "nonConformat" in the text.
There's also maybe one problem with deriving conformance test plans from DWBP but I'm going to continue the discussion in #652 where @riccardoAlbertoni has answered me.

With my latest commit, we have resolved the "(non)conformat" and implemented the result of the discussion in #652 (i.e., how DWBP relates to the plan derivation in the examples).
I think we reasonably ready for merging into the main document, aren't we?

[aisaac]

Yes it's probably the time to merge everything - including #652 (is it included in this one?)

[riccardoAlbertoni]

@aisaac wrote

Yes it's probably the time to merge everything - including #652 (is it included in this one?)

#652 is already merged in this one.

[davebrowning]

Marked as non substantive for IPR from ash-nazg.