Added definitions and scope-notes for dct: prov: foaf: and odrl: props

[dr-shorthair]

Content copied over from the rec document

As discussed in #725

[dr-shorthair]

1. In cases where the DCAT CR has a 'definition' which is different to the external original, I have copied them into a skos:definition element ;

2. In a few cases, the Usage Note is different in the context of different classes - typically replacing 'resource' with 'distribution' or similar. I have simply copied each usage note into a separate skos:scopeNote.

[davebrowning]

Actual change looks okay to me, but there is a conflict that needs addressing in the list of namespaces. (Would have just fixed that but realised I wasn't quite sure how it had come about - think the main branch has had some added (e.g. oa: earl:) but when I look in the conflict resolution screen it looks....strange....

[riccardoAlbertoni]

@davebrowning :

Actual change looks okay to me, but there is a conflict that needs addressing in the list of namespaces. (Would have just fixed that but realised I wasn't quite sure how it had come about - think the main branch has had some added (e.g. oa: earl:) but when I look in the conflict resolution screen it looks....strange....

I have solved the conflict, my opinion is that we can drop the "<code></code>" tags and keep the namespace definitions we currently have in the gh-pages. I remember myself adding some of the additional namespaces as they were used in the document but not declared.

[davebrowning]

Thanks @riccardoAlbertoni - that looks better now. [Not sure what github was showing me before but I'll put it down to my confusion...]