Conformance Tests #7
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rather than worrying about build scripts, shorthands, or any complications, I just started writing a few tests for the RS spec. Most of these try to check conformance of XML processing. I also made a version of the Acid2 test, as that seemed one way to test the requirement about reading systems with a viewport:
These will all need a lot of work. The main goal was to have some tests to help uncover issues in the spec, such as w3c/epub-specs#1456.
For convenience, I made a folder that just has EPUBs in it, in addition to the unzipped folders.