Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WCAG 2.2 comments and suggestions #31

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 10, 2023
Merged

WCAG 2.2 comments and suggestions #31

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 10, 2023

Conversation

aphillips
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@aphillips aphillips requested a review from xfq August 8, 2023 21:18
@@ -10,6 +10,17 @@ The [Chinese Layout Task Force](https://github.com/w3c/clreq) is also discussing

I will let you know when the group has a consensus on this.

@aphillips notes:
> 80 characters seems like it might have a historical basis, such as the use of terminals or software
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree. We also discussed this issue in yesterday's clreq TF teleconference, and some people think that the 80 characters limit is very arbitrary, even for English, because the limit is greatly affected by the font size and font.

Comment on lines +88 to +90
> I am not sure about the "translated into another language" suggestion because the translation should be a direct translation, rather than attempting to codify
> the needs of a specific language or writing system. The intention of the WCAG group should be preserved. If this recommendation really means "When creating
> WCAG standards for another language...", then we should say that.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, that's what I mean. Thank you.

@aphillips aphillips merged commit 8fe6a31 into gh-pages Aug 10, 2023
@aphillips aphillips deleted the aphillips-patch-2 branch December 7, 2023 17:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants